Missile Guidance Enhancers

Recently, an update was rolled out on SiSi and several new types of modules were found. This picture quickly hit the top of r/eve and speculation ran rampant. These new modules are called Missile Guidance Enhancers; one can only assume that they are a missile version of the Tracking Enhancer. A lot of people are really excited about this; personally, I am less impressed, and think they will only have some niche use on ships that rarely get flown. I have previously written a lengthy post about theorycrafting missiles here, and while it leaves large missiles out, it gives a good picture of what missile types people use and how Rigor and Flare rigs affect them. I think it is really important to take into consideration just how strong of a bonus rigs give compared to modules. This mostly offset by how static their fitting is, and once they are there they have to be destroyed to be replaced. For example, a T2 locus rig gives 20 % more optimal. This number is huge compared to what you get from a tracking computer; you only get this close using a Cormack’s Modified Tracking Computer. Of course, tracking computers have the benefit of providing both optimal and falloff compared to rigs, which either provide optimal range with Rigors or falloff with Ambits. I don’t consider this to be that big of a deal though, because of how normal weapon systems are designed—giving a clear advantage to either having a lot of optimal with lasers, or a lot of falloff with projectiles. A T2 tracking enhancer provides 10 % optimal, 20 % falloff and 9.5 % tracking. They do a lot, but like I’ve said, you only want either the optimal or falloff depending on what type of weapon you use, with the tracking bonus being a nice extra bonus. The Missile Guidance Enhancers would probably provide range on missiles, and improve the explosion velocity or explosion radius giving you more range and more application. The question here is which stats get the most bonuses. On normal Tracking Enhancers, tracking gets the lowest bonus at 10%, and I could see missile explosive radius getting it, since it is the stat that matters the most when talking about missile application. For missile range there are actually two stats affecting how much range a missile has: Fuel and velocity. Ideally you want as much velocity as possible since that helps your missile damage hit faster, and makes it easier to hit targets burning away from you. In order to keep it in line with TEs and provide similar bonuses I think the end result would be: 9.5% Explosion Radius 10% Velocity 20% More Fuel


I think most people can put one and one together and see what exciting stuff is coming next after this. But for now, I am feeling pretty indifferent after seeing the Missile Guidance Enhancers on SiSi . This is the first time we are getting a module that buffs missile application directly. Most of the time, fits have been using Rigors or Hydraulic Bay Thrusters to increase application or range directly; or totally avoiding the problem by going with a smaller type of missile, such as Rapid Lights in order to avoid the application problem. There is also the problem with missile ships not having many low slots left over after fitting Ballistic Controls and Damage Controls. This does, however, give you the choice of either more raw damage or application. We can pretty much rule these low-slot modules out for frigates overall, since they already apply well and don’t have low slots to spare. For cruisers, there are no ships that would benefit—especially having access to rapid lights. There could be some niches such as HAM Caracal/Cerberus, but they don’t have the low slots to sacrifice and are much better off with a Rigor rig. I think these will first find use in the battlecruiser class. And no, the Drake doesn’t have enough low slots to fit these, so don’t bother. The Cyclone, however, is a ship I could see sacrificing a low slot for one of these for better HAM application. The same goes for a Gnosis, if you think that HAMs are the way to go. Typhoon For command ships we have the Damnation, Claymore, and Nighthawk as missile platforms. The Claymore doesn’t have enough low slots to justify sacrificing one. The other two command ships definitely do, however while I think the Nighthawk needs more help than this, it could benefit from one of these modules. Same with the Damnation, which usually has a strong armor buffer and more then enough low slots. Battleships are the class where these modules will really start to make sense. I could see it helping greatly with Rapid Heavy Missile Launchers and cruise missiles. Ships such as the Raven or Typhoon and its faction variants, have more then enough slots to necessitate one of these, although the damage application isn’t that great unless you have full tackle on someone. The ships here that will be extra terrifying with more application are the Barghest and the Typhoon. The Typhoon already has good application with the bonus to torpedo and cruise explosion velocity. This bonus doesn’t apply to rapid heavy missiles though, and this is where the Missile Guidance Enhancer will come to good use. For the Barghest, we already have a ship with good range and damage with strong bonuses and a lot of free low slots; it might be even better with one of these, allowing you to drop maybe one Rigor rig for another warp speed rig. Lastly, these modules will help the elitist of the elite ships, the Phoenix and Leviathan, do a bit more damage. But I leave that experimentation up to Lords Servant. In short, these modules will provide more flexibility in fittings. I don’t see them being the end-all must-have, replacing Ballistic Controls; I don’t think CCP thinks that way either.

Problems and the Future

It’s a fair guess that these modules are only the beginning. I could very well see missile tracking computers coming and maybe even the long rumored missile TDs. I am a lot more excited for a missile tracking computer then I am for a missile tracking enhancer. Mostly because most missile ships are shield tanked, and have quite few low slots to sacrifice. A missile TC would open up a lot more flexibility, and almost all missile ships can sacrifice a mid slot for more application. The problem I see is that there are many mid slots that indirectly increase your damage application. This missile TC, for example, would compete with target painters and webs and there would be some problems where the TP is made less valuable. There will be some stacking penalties though; I hope CCP gets the balance right. For missile TDs, I am unsure. At first, I hated the idea because I really don’t like EWAR when it’s not on my side. Then I thought about it, and while you might see ships like Crucifiers totally shutting down an Orthrus, they’re probably not going to be as strong as damps. The biggest benefit with missile TDs, is that it will give less experienced players the illusion that they are doing something with their missiles when the reality is that they are disrupted down to 10 km range. I don’t think these modules will make heavy missiles and torpedoes come out of the shadows, as they suffer from far worse problems than a low slot mod will fix. Heavy missiles need to be reverted to their pre-nerf stage now that every ship is faster, torpedoes are way too hard to fit, and after cruises were buffed, compared to their longer ranged cousin they were left inflexible. I consider this a good start, but I’m going to wait for the stats before I get excited. It will help medium missiles—large ones especially—but is it enough? It’s now a waiting game.  
Tags: gorski

About the author

Gorski Car

Gorski Car was a CSM 9 member whose theorycrafting and knowledge of mechanics has had a key role in helping CCP adjust how we play EVE. He is an avid small gang PvPer with a background in lowsec, but flies in all areas of space, depending on his fancy.


    Gorski I believe I found a typo. You see I read this whole article and didn’t see the word “stealth bomber” in it, despite the word “torpedo” being extremely prevalent.

    • BS

      I think it’s because torp SBs are not really pvp ships. They are ok for structure bash and ganking ratters I guess but not really for pvp

      • Kamar Raimo

        Ganking ratters is not PVP?

    • Servant’s Lord

      also it says “Lords Servant” where infact it should say “idiots”

  • callduron

    “For example, a T2 locus rig gives 20 % more optimal. This number is huge compared to what you get from a tracking computer”

    You might want to start using scripts, Gorski.

  • Kaal

    100mn HAMGus rejoice. For loss of paper dps, more applicable dps and projection is a no brainer

  • Fun BeiTao

    I love all kinds of missiles and i want to see the great-white-DRAKE-whale again, roaming the oceans of eve and hunt some seaman.

    One tip to rule Eve:
    ECM – Hulltanked – HML – Drake!

    Jokes a side, i like the new modules and changes.
    Divestity is good for eve.

    Have a nice day.

  • ivona fly

    S T E A L H — B O M B E R S. Gorski and also…. Pheonix

  • Kamar Raimo

    I totally missed that those MGEs are actually a thing. I thought when you discussed them that you were speaking hypothetically. I agree with you that a midslot missile bonus module would be much nicer than a lowslot module. With armour you always have the choice between gank and tank in the lows. Clearly the same would make sense as a tradeoff for shield ships in the mids.

  • Leo2014

    With the new info out from the o7 show it looks like the new Missile mods will prove to be a big step in bringing heavy missiles back and making other missiles better.

    As for mid-slot competing with TP, it will be hands down better unless you are bonused for TPs. TP are single targeted and have a cycle time, and only help with application via explosion radius. The new modules will allow application and/or range and to all targets without a cycle timer.

    Also you didn’t mention the ability to have more rigging choices by not being the only place to improve range/application. With the mid-slot you can actually add dps via rigs instead of range/application now.